No Safeword - MJ 2

Description:

Title: Quantitative Analysis of Prototype Sensory Amplification Tools in Hyperstimulation Scenarios: A Single-Subject Blind Trial

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy of novel tactile amplification tools (prototypes P-07, P-12, P-19) against established instruments (E-03, E-11) in inducing hyperstimulation within a controlled BDSM-tickling paradigm. A veteran subject (MJ, 28 y/o) with documented hypersensitivity in pedal zones served as the primary test candidate. Blind protocols were implemented to mitigate placebo effects, with observer feedback triangulated via QR-coded response systems.

Methodology

Subject Preparation

1. Restraint System:
• Subject was sealed within a full-coverage leather sheath (Fettishlabs Model #HLV-45), with extremities secured to a reinforced steel table (v2.1) via ankle clamps (1/2” lynchpin mechanism).
• Pedal regions were isolated using a dual-tension system:
• Hallux: Ratcheted leather straps applied 37° dorsiflexion.
• Digits II–V: Splayed via 10mm nylon cord (tension: 15N).
2. Orofacial Immobilization:
• Microfoam tape (3” width, Fettishtools #MF-90) was applied in a wrap pattern over the oral cavity, extending to the zygomatic arches and submental region.
3. Stimulus Delivery:
• Tools were randomized (prototypes vs. established) and applied to the metatarsophalangeal junction for random intervals.
• New stimuli included:
• REDACTED (miniature pulse node)
• REDACTED (TGun v2)
• REDACTED (multi speed rotating pad brush)

Data Collection

• Primary Metric: Subject’s post-trial identification of “most effective” tool via questionnaire.
• Secondary Metrics: Observer ratings (1–10 scale) submitted via QR code, tracking physiological responses (respiratory rate, lacrimation).

Discussion

While none of the tools underperformed, the highest rated during post interview was self reported by MJ to be the Terrorizers v1, with the rest of the experience ‘blending together’ due to intensity. She has been given an emailed form to be filled out at a later date once the effects of the experience wear off.

Results are unable to be tabulated fully at this time, until both specimen and observers return full feedback to be processed and examined.