The Tickle Table - Miss Mia 3

Description:

Investigating the Effects of Oral Restraint on Tickle Sensitivity: A Comparative Study

Volunteer: Miss Mia, a Hispanic female with exceptionally ticklish bare feet

Experimental Setup:

1. Immobilization: Miss Mia is secured to the Tickle Table v2 using a leather sheath from neck to ankles, with steel stocks fastened via a large lynchpin.
2. Toe Fixation: Her toes are affixed with leather strapping and secured backward in the extreme flex position using the ratcheting system.
3. Oral Restraint Phases: Three distinct phases of oral restraint are applied to assess any differences in tickle sensitivity:
• Phase 1: No gag present, allowing for unhindered vocalization and movement.
• Phase 2: Wrap gagged with microfoam, sealing the entire lower half of her face from just under her nose to under her chin, restricting vocalization and movement.
• Phase 3: An improved ballgag harness, forming a leather cage containing her head and  belted in place,  wedging a large red ball in her mouth, further restricting vocalization and movement.

Observation and Data Collection:

Observers are encouraged to take detailed notes on Miss Mia's physical reactions, body language, and visual cues during each phase. Parameters to be observed and recorded include:

• Tickle Response: Intensity and duration of laughter, squirming, and other physical reactions to tickling stimuli.
• Body Language: Posture, facial expressions, and non-verbal cues indicating comfort, discomfort, or distress.
• Visual Cues: Eye contact, pupil dilation, and other visual indicators of arousal or anxiety.

Research Questions:

1. Do different stages of oral restraint affect Miss Mia's tickle sensitivity and response?
2. Are there observable differences in physical reactions, body language, and visual cues between the three phases?
3. Can the results inform the development of more effective tickling protocols in future experiments?

Conclusion:

This experiment aims to contribute to the understanding of the complex relationship between oral restraint and tickle sensitivity. By systematically applying varying levels of oral restraint, we can gain insight into the psychological and physiological responses to tickling stimuli. The findings of this study may have implications for the development of novel tickling techniques and protocols in the field of BDSM and tickle fetishism.