Tickle Therapy - Charmie

Description:

• Clinical Trial Protocol: Machine Versus Human Tickling Efficacy

  Subject Profile:

  • Name: Charmie
  • Physical Description: Tattooed blonde with light green streaks in her hair
  • Attire: Black shorts, straitjacket
  • Restraint Apparatus: Padded chair, black leather leg restraints, wooden stocks for ankles

  Introduction: The present study aims to investigate the comparative efficacy of machine-based and human-administered tickling in inducing ticklish sensations in a human subject. The hypothesis under scrutiny is whether machine-based tickling or human touch elicits a more intense ticklish response.

  Methodology: The subject, Charmie, is secured to a padded chair, wearing a straitjacket to restrict upper body movement. Her legs are spread and held in place by black leather straps, with each ankle locked in wooden stocks. The subject's vulnerable and sensitive bare feet are further immobilized using rubber loops on the big toes and the two adjacent toes.

  Machine-Based Tickling: Unforgiving automatic tickling machines are employed, featuring multi-quilled brushes historically used for information extraction, punishment, and pleasure. These machines scrub the subject's feet vertically and horizontally at varying speeds, applying consistent and relentless stimulation.

  Human-Administered Tickling: Following the machine-based tickling phase, the primary tester utilizes bare hands to tickle the subject's bare feet, introducing a human element to the stimulation. Soft, long feathers are also employed to stimulate the feet and the areas between the bound toes.

  Dual Tester Protocol: A secondary tester, Trinity, a tattooed raven-haired beauty, joins the primary tester, utilizing a long yellow feather to assist in the tickling process. This dual tester approach allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the subject's responses to varied tickling stimuli.

  Escalation of Stimulation: The primary tester increases the intensity of the stimulation by scrubbing the subject's right foot hard and fast, eliciting wails of rapid-fire laughter. The decision is made to restrain the subject's toes further, binding all toes except the pinky toes with black 5mm cord, to minimize movement and maintain access to the highly vulnerable areas between the toes.

  Conclusion: The experiment concludes with a second round of fingers and feathers, followed by an intensified tickling session involving Assist Trinity. The introduction of vibrating brushes, fingers, fingernails, and the Shocker tickle tool ensures a multifaceted assessment of the subject's ticklish responses. The data collected from this trial will contribute significantly to the understanding of human ticklishness and the relative efficacy of machine-based versus human-administered tickling.